Research Finds Narcissistic CEOs More Likely to Adopt Disruptive Technologies

UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — Corporate CEOs who exhibit narcissistic personality traits are more likely to embrace discontinuous or disruptive technologies than their less narcissistic counterparts, according to research by Donald Hambrick of Penn State’s Smeal College of Business and colleagues from the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg and IMD International.

The researchers describe discontinuous technologies as “contradicting the prevailing mindset in an industry, rendering existing organizational structures and processes obsolete, and diminishing the value of existing knowledge.” As such, existing firms are often seen as resistant, based on the risk and the high level of resources that would be needed for implementation.

But not all existing firms eschew adoption of these technologies, according to the researchers. Their study shows that CEOs with narcissistic personalities are more likely to take the associated risks. The researchers examined investments in biotechnology made by large pharmaceutical firms from 1980 to 2008 and found considerable support for their hypothesis.

Narcissism, as a personality dimension on which everyone can be arrayed, refers to traits such as a “strong sense of superiority,” a drive to “dominate their environments,” a “high degree of restlessness,” a “lack of empathy” and a “strong need for attention and applause,” the researchers wrote.

CEOs who exhibit more narcissistic traits, then, are seen as more likely to adopt discontinuous technologies for several reasons. Their sense of superiority gives them the confidence to take big risks. Their tendency toward restlessness makes them more open to change — even the radical sort that discontinuous technologies can bring. And they lean toward more dramatic decision-making with the understanding that their bold moves will garner attention among peers and in the press.

To this, researchers add two moderating factors: audience engagement — “the degree to which observers view a domain … as noteworthy and provocative” — and managerial attention — the level of focus that a firm’s senior managers place on a certain phenomenon.

“Bearing in mind that audience enthrallment with a technology can ebb and flow, and envisioning that managerial attention to a technology can similarly rise and fall, we anticipate that the narcissistic CEO will press for more attention at those times when a respected audience considers the technology as provocative and noteworthy,” wrote the researchers.

“CEO Narcissism, Audience Engagement, and Organizational Adoption of Technological Discontinuities” appears in the June 2013 issue of Administrative Science Quarterly. In addition to Hambrick, who is Smeal Chaired Professor of Management, authors include Wolf-Christian Gerstner and Andreas Konig of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, and Albrecht Enders of IMD International.

Source: Penn State University News

How to Explain Your Career Transition

by Dorie Clark

Shifting careers is often hard to explain. Whether you’re moving from one department to another in your own company or starting over in an entirely different field, you’re likely to face a litany of rejoinders: Why would you want to do that? Isn’t that a little risky? Are you really qualified? Others won’t raise any outward objections, but privately, you can tell they’re skeptical.

The most important step in getting others onboard with your career transition is crafting a compelling narrative. It’s a tool often overlooked by “professional reinventers,” but it can be a critical determinant of success in winning others’ support for your professional goals and vision for the future. Continue reading

How To Solve Onboarding’s Awkward Alienation Problem

Even if you’re a management professor, starting out at a place feels weird. Such was the case for Francesca Gino, who left the Univerisity of North Carolina for Harvard back in 2010.

It’s 2010 and Francesca Gino is just about to start teaching at Harvard Business School. She was excited yes, but also “a little anxious” about meeting the standards of her new organization–proof positive that starting at a new place is a heady experience, even if you’re a professor of management. Continue reading

Inside with Gianpiero Petriglieri, Associate Professor of Organizational Behavior at INSEAD

Interviewed by Larry Janis, Managing Partner, Integrated Search Solutions

LJ: What is your role at INSEAD?

GP: I am associate professor of Organizational Behavior.  My work involves researching, teaching, coaching, consulting and administration and it revolves around studying and supporting the development of leaders and leadership. I am particularly interested in how and where people engaged in mobile and uncertain careers develop and sustain the personal foundations, professional abilities and social bonds that enable them to exercise leadership mindfully, effectively and responsibly. I direct the Management Acceleration Programme, the school’s flagship program for emerging leaders, as well as customized experiential leadership development program for corporations in a variety of industries. I taught for half a decade in the INSEAD MBA program however, I am currently devoting myself primarily to executive education. I also direct the school-wide Initiative for Teaching Excellence and Learning Innovation. Continue reading

Turn Talent Data Into Real Information

Nik Kinley and Schlomo Ben-Hurby Nik Kinley and Schlomo Ben-Hur

Big data is all the rage in HR recently. But more immediately promising is the talk of small data —  of more effectively managing the data we already have before we start thinking about analyzing more complex datasets.  And nowhere is this more pertinent than with talent assessment data. For here, sitting right under organizations’ noses, is a huge, easy, and yet almost always overlooked opportunity to fundamentally improve the way companies select and develop their talent. Continue reading